« July 2014 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
The Blog for AGiR!
Friday, 18 July 2014

Mood:  don't ask

Howdy!

We are into the 197th day of 2014, supposed to be a year 'for genomic integrity,' yet good news about protecting yourself from all the potential dangers out there is not easily found!  

While people from 23 countries have already visited the site for AGiR! and some interest has been expressed in the flyer campaign, because it is clear that each generation has to learn afresh, at the same time sunscreens recommended as less genotoxic (containing, at least, less benzene derivatives) are often unavailable, as already mentioned in a previous post.  Additionally, it is not only the ones found via Amazon with this problem, for example, here is something recommended by another site that is simply not in stock.  If it was sold out, shouldn't we see tubes of it at the beach??  

In the meantime, something clearly hazardous, like that classic solution for covering gray hair, Grecian Formula, full of lead acetate, is readily purchased from Amazon (as again already mentioned in a previous post)!!

 (Of note: lead combs and vinegar were not only popular in ancient Rome, perhaps contributing to the fall of their empire, but were also mentioned by Alexander Dumas in one of his musketeer books '20 years after' with an aging musketeer using this for his beard and clearly affecting his mental capacity...)  

This is all very frustrating, and is certainly not a desirable situation for any protection of genomic integrity, particularly for water-sport lovers, who need safe sunscreens.  The cult of youth of course leads some to directly poison the muscle fibers of their own face with botulism toxin, the popular BoTox, which seems like a very poor idea for actors, meant to communicate emotion...  What can we do?? 

Additionally, while certain ingredients have been highlighted by various groups, in particular things that are hormone-mimetic substances (some of which are replaced by things potentially just as risky), many are still quite commonly seen in ingredient lists, while others are still under the radar, except in certain cases.  For instance, it is very frustrating to have to see four types of acrylamide derivatives in skin creams for women and girls, when one knows it is the classic neurotoxin.  One could almost wonder whether some sort of conspiracy against people using their intelligence is in play, with lead in expensive lipsticks (that are obviously licked off and ingested) and plasticizing neurotoxins (the acrylamide derivatives) as wrinkle fillers!  I certainly don't like this idea one bit!  But why otherwise would such ingredients be put into personal care products??

Silicone is another ingredient, supposedly inert, but used in personal care products quite frequently and perhaps filling our waterways eternally, with unknown consequences. Furthermore, the ingredient methylene glycol (which basically converts to formaldehyde, although there are efforts to deny this in a pseudo-scientific way that was shocking, especially in light of its creepy conflict of interest statement!) is entirely too common in ingredient lists of personal care products, and the super straight brazilian blow out process is still far too popular, even though, as documented by Sharon Neufeldt since 2010 for instance, it also leads to quite high risks of formaldehyde exposure, and thus carcinogenesis. 

Hoping for some changes, even though this post has turned into a bit of a rant, unfortunately!  

Thanks for your help and spread the word!

best wishes!


shared by AGiR! at 8:48 AM MEST
Updated: Friday, 18 July 2014 5:21 PM MEST
Post Comment | View Comments (4) | Permalink

Sunday, 20 July 2014 - 9:16 PM MEST

Name: "me"
Home Page: http://www.genomicintegrity.org

on another point, while in this mode (the rant! complaining!!): what the heck is going on with recent issues of Vogue depicting so many models with cigarettes in hand and mouth!!!  Who made that decision, and why - one has to ask??  Seeing such things is anything but a positive point of this 'year for genomic integrity' at any rate!  sigh.

Monday, 21 July 2014 - 10:07 AM MEST

Name: "maggie"

that's fashion for you (and corporate sponsorship most likely!) - leading to the worst sort of fashion victimisation!  EFV!  :)

Of note, a cigarette brand 'Vogue' has been marketed for quite some time by the British American Tobacco company...  At the same time, the Vogue archive has articles about the best ways to *quit* smoking!

There is even someone's fashion blog that has a montage of lots of such pictures at the top, but no explanation for it all, http://vogueandcigarettes.blogspot.ch  (for those who would like to see examples and don't want to flip through the magazine...)  I wonder if the girl, a self described shopaholic who also has a facebook page with a similar name that focussed on fashion, knows what she is helping to promote.

More people are learning however.  Don't get too frustrated, even though I know your pain too, in the search for a 'good' sunscreen! 

keep up the good work! 

Monday, 4 August 2014 - 2:38 AM MEST

Name: "jim"

please see also:

http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/14/4/220.2.full

 

maybe DNA jewelry is the way to get the fashionista's into genomic integrity? 

Monday, 4 August 2014 - 11:38 PM MEST

Name: "me"
Home Page: http://www.genomicintegrity.org

Thanks for the link, Jim!!  It is cool to see a scientific article about how fashion mags are still pushing cigarettes (sadly)!

I like your idea of using DNA jewelry as a counter measure, too!  In fact, some nice silver DNA charms for the last EFV Prize (you can find out more about this from the original site of genomicintegrity.org, to End Fashion Victimization, linked from the AGiR! site sidebar, and from other pages too) were given to winners last Fall!

Spread the word! 

View Latest Entries